Michael,
I spoke with Mr. Vargas (TSE) and Mr. Sharma (Lead Engineer?). There were some audio difficulties, but the takeaway from the conversation was that they are still convinced the 200.7-8 speed issues were indication only (an issue with Speedflex). I am the farthest thing from a network specialist, so I can't argue. It just "seems" that the network performance matches the indications. Overall, 200.6 performs better than 200.8. In the simplest example, 4k media buffers on >200.7, but doesn't on 200.6 (both on Gigabit).
Additionally, they were unable to address my signal strength issues. Since it has to do with the placement of the WAPs (center of each floor), it falls back on the deployment of the system (Lennar), not Ruckus. Again, I'm not a network architect, but if my ISP provided Gateway can cover my entire two-story home, I'm not sure why 2 Enterprise-grade WAP's can't.
DESPITE MY FRUSTRATION, I really do appreciate you taking action on this and handling my case personally. It's not every day that a single user gets to speak with a lead engineer. I'll continue to follow this forum to see if there's any resolution. Unfortunately, like many of us during the past several months, I've been working from home. And at this point I NEED to address my intermittent connectivity and will be seeking other options.
Cheers,
Rich