cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

New Vlan Can't Reach the Internet

kvon12
New Contributor III

Hello,

I just took over a ruckus network and I am trying to create a new vlan that needs access to the internet. I built vlan 215 the same as several of the preexisting vlans that are working and have access to the internet but still can't reach out. I wasn't sure if I was missing something or if there is possibly an issue with the firewall. Host on vlan 215 are able to reach the dhcp server and grab a lease. I have checked the firewall and don't believe it to be an issue there but not certain. I have included below the configuration I thought would be helpful but I'm still learning so please let me know if you need something else. 

ve 202 is working. ve 215 is the new one that is not working. VE 202 is in ospf area 0 but it doesn't look like ospf is in use. 

show ip route output

Destination Gateway Port Cost Type Uptime
1 0.0.0.0/0 10.9.100.240 ve 100 1/1 S 28d3h

28 10.9.202.0/24 DIRECT ve 202 0/0 D 28d3h

33 10.9.215.0/24 DIRECT ve 215 0/0 D 3d19h

SSH@STC-CN-129-BCS#show running-config vlan 202
vlan 202 name by port
tagged ethe 1/1/15 lag 6 to 8
router-interface ve 202
spanning-tree 802-1w
spanning-tree 802-1w priority 0
multicast version 2
!
!
SSH@STC-CN-129-BCS#show running-config vlan 215
vlan 215 name by port
tagged lag 6 to 8
router-interface ve 215
spanning-tree 802-1w
spanning-tree 802-1w priority 0
multicast version 2

SSH@STC-CN-129-BCS#show running-config int ve 100
interface ve 100
port-name VL100
ip address 10.9.100.1 255.255.255.0
!
SSH@STC-CN-129-BCS#show running-config int ve 202
interface ve 202
port-name VL202
ip address 10.9.202.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 1 10.9.50.71 unicast
ip ospf area 0
!
SSH@STC-CN-129-BCS#show running-config int ve 215
interface ve 215
ip address 10.9.215.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 1 10.9.50.71 unicast

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

kvon12
New Contributor III

I found the issue with the routing on the firewall. 

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1