RUCKUS Community Forums are now in READ-ONLY mode while we migrate to a new platform.
You will still be able to read posts and knowledge articles, but will be unable to post new content until Go Live on the new platform Monday August 17.
Lennar Smart Home customers: please contact [email protected] for assistance during the week of August 9-17.
03-16-2026 12:57 AM
Hi everyone,
I am currently working on the Wi-Fi infrastructure design for a new hotel and resort project. We are strongly considering an all-Unleashed deployment to avoid the overhead of a physical controller.
Our current design consists of 75 to 80 Wi-Fi 6 APs (a mix of R650s for the ballroom/restaurant, H550s for the guest rooms, and some R350s/T350s for common/outdoor areas). To ensure the Unleashed cluster has maximum processing power and stability, we plan to deploy a high-end R750 specifically configured as the Preferred Master AP.
While the official datasheet states that Unleashed can handle up to 128 APs, I have heard rumors from a few local system integrators that in practical, real-world scenarios, Unleashed starts to struggle or become unstable once it passes the 25-30 AP mark. They usually push for a Virtual SmartZone (vSZ) or hardware controller at this scale.
I would love to hear some real-world feedback from this community:
Does anyone have Unleashed deployments running smoothly with 70-80+ APs in a high-density hospitality environment?
Is the "30 AP limit" rumor just a legacy issue from the older Wi-Fi 5 days (e.g., using an older R500/R600 as Master), or is it still a valid concern today, even with a powerhouse like the R750 running the cluster?
Any insights, shared experiences, or best practices would be greatly appreciated before we lock in the final design.
Thanks in advance!
