I tested a failover and takeover of unleashed aps.
However, it did not meet our expectations.
In my lab, I deployed two ap; a H510 and a H320;, and configured static ip address on each.
I did master setup to H510 and member setup to H320.
Once I confirmed all aps were good working, went down power to all APs.
And I was turned on H320 which was member ap before a reboot.
But election of new master didn't occur.
The H320 which was member ap before a reboot became new master for about 20min.
Why is the new election process so slow?
If this situation was a real, customer would have many complaints becasue he thought a network problem.
Are Ruckus aware of this?
From your recommentaion, once I tried to replicate this with R610(master, static ip 10.10.20.101) and H510(member, static ip 10.10.20.105), H510 after power-on took over new master in about 90sec but debug log for election is empty on syslog though I set debug level.
Unfortunatly H510 had static ip 10.10.20.101 which was ip address of R610.
What is that?