200.5.10.0.291 doesn't fix the packet loss for stations connected to MAP
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
12-18-2017 01:05 PM
As described in a few replies to https://forums.ruckuswireless.com/ruckuswireless/topics/ruckus-unleashed-200-5-has-bug , I'm experiencing an issue with my Unleashed mesh set-up. The topology and set-up can't be simpler - one RAP, one MAP (both R710), one network (2.4+5), WPA2 auth.
Used to work flawlessly before upgrade to 200.5.x, with the same config.
After APs boot up, all starts off great. After a period of time (sometimes as short as an hour or so), stations connected to the MAP start experiencing packet loss / transmission delays. If MAP is power-cycled, problem clears - clients are happy, until they are not again.
When the issue is present, RAP-MAP speed test doesn't show up any significant slow-down - it's around 400-450Mbps, just as when all is OK.
Channels are stable - I don't see any movements, even after MAP reboot, it comes up to occupy the same channels as before. There is no significant interference. 2.4 uses Background Scanning, 5 uses ChannelFly.
Was hoping that upgrading to 200.5.10.0.291 would help, but no, it didn't.
Would really like my stability back, please.
Used to work flawlessly before upgrade to 200.5.x, with the same config.
After APs boot up, all starts off great. After a period of time (sometimes as short as an hour or so), stations connected to the MAP start experiencing packet loss / transmission delays. If MAP is power-cycled, problem clears - clients are happy, until they are not again.
When the issue is present, RAP-MAP speed test doesn't show up any significant slow-down - it's around 400-450Mbps, just as when all is OK.
Channels are stable - I don't see any movements, even after MAP reboot, it comes up to occupy the same channels as before. There is no significant interference. 2.4 uses Background Scanning, 5 uses ChannelFly.
Was hoping that upgrading to 200.5.10.0.291 would help, but no, it didn't.
Would really like my stability back, please.
4 REPLIES 4

