<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MESH for stand alone APs in ZoneDirector</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/MESH-for-stand-alone-APs/m-p/36234#M6459</link>
    <description>How about now that Ruckus is moving into SMB market, you enable MESH feature on stand-alone APs too. Tying this to a ZD IMO is a function of driving ZD sales than anything else.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Reasons:
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
- ZD is part of the management and control plane not access
&lt;BR /&gt;
- I can't remember the last time we implemented a MESH network for a big client, like a hotel or something but
&lt;BR /&gt;
- Big majority (talking from my experiences here) MESH requirements are for very small implementations of up to 3 APs which makes a ZD sale hard and usually causes a purchase of some other cheap vendor
&lt;BR /&gt;
- There are other more prominent features a ZD brings to a network, like: band-steering, coordinated channel allocation, logging, graphical speed tests, real time monitoring, zero-it, etc, etc, etc, so MESH really isn't a feature that makes a sale at all.
&lt;BR /&gt;
- You've got the R300 now which is the first AP that doesn't support MESH so selling a ZD because of MESH isn't an option.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
I would say that sales of ZD wouldn't suffer a bit since there are other easier reasons for selling a ZD and I would rather sell stand-alone APs now and maybe a ZD later, then loose an opportunity because of pushing for a ZD at the start.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-04-28T10:03:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MESH for stand alone APs</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/MESH-for-stand-alone-APs/m-p/36234#M6459</link>
      <description>How about now that Ruckus is moving into SMB market, you enable MESH feature on stand-alone APs too. Tying this to a ZD IMO is a function of driving ZD sales than anything else.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Reasons:
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
- ZD is part of the management and control plane not access
&lt;BR /&gt;
- I can't remember the last time we implemented a MESH network for a big client, like a hotel or something but
&lt;BR /&gt;
- Big majority (talking from my experiences here) MESH requirements are for very small implementations of up to 3 APs which makes a ZD sale hard and usually causes a purchase of some other cheap vendor
&lt;BR /&gt;
- There are other more prominent features a ZD brings to a network, like: band-steering, coordinated channel allocation, logging, graphical speed tests, real time monitoring, zero-it, etc, etc, etc, so MESH really isn't a feature that makes a sale at all.
&lt;BR /&gt;
- You've got the R300 now which is the first AP that doesn't support MESH so selling a ZD because of MESH isn't an option.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
I would say that sales of ZD wouldn't suffer a bit since there are other easier reasons for selling a ZD and I would rather sell stand-alone APs now and maybe a ZD later, then loose an opportunity because of pushing for a ZD at the start.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/MESH-for-stand-alone-APs/m-p/36234#M6459</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-28T10:03:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MESH for stand alone APs</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/MESH-for-stand-alone-APs/m-p/36235#M6460</link>
      <description>Is it possible to use Mesh without ZD? For example only 2 AP, one wired (root AP) and other one AP with Mesh.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 06:30:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/MESH-for-stand-alone-APs/m-p/36235#M6460</guid>
      <dc:creator>jjj_jjj_6588794</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-26T06:30:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MESH for stand alone APs</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/MESH-for-stand-alone-APs/m-p/36236#M6461</link>
      <description>Sorry, I thought I was clear with my request.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
You can't have MESH functionality without a ZD and here I'm asking them to enable it so you can.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 07:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/MESH-for-stand-alone-APs/m-p/36236#M6461</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-26T07:10:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MESH for stand alone APs</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/MESH-for-stand-alone-APs/m-p/36237#M6462</link>
      <description>I agree on all points.... would be very nice to have for smaller residential deployments.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/MESH-for-stand-alone-APs/m-p/36237#M6462</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeff_roback</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-16T22:40:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

