<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Meshing in ZoneDirector</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/Meshing/m-p/22503#M4528</link>
    <description>Meshing has nothing to do with devices roaming between points as far as I understand it! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; - and yes, wired network failure is a predominant use for Mesh.  Also, could be bridging two separate wired network as we used once, long ago, between a temporary building on site and the main school.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martin_kane</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-31T21:13:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Meshing</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/Meshing/m-p/22502#M4527</link>
      <description>We have a ZD1100 with 5 zf7962 and 7 zf7341 all connected to our gigabit wired network. A "consultant" has recommended meshing be enabled to enhance roaming between access points.  I cannot find any documentation to support this - in fact most seems to suggest not enabling meshing. The only possible advantage would be if part of the wired network failed then the aps may still operate. Should I believe the consultant?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:55:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/Meshing/m-p/22502#M4527</guid>
      <dc:creator>ian_macpherson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-31T20:55:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Meshing</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/Meshing/m-p/22503#M4528</link>
      <description>Meshing has nothing to do with devices roaming between points as far as I understand it! &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; - and yes, wired network failure is a predominant use for Mesh.  Also, could be bridging two separate wired network as we used once, long ago, between a temporary building on site and the main school.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/Meshing/m-p/22503#M4528</guid>
      <dc:creator>martin_kane</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-31T21:13:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Meshing</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/Meshing/m-p/22504#M4529</link>
      <description>I think they might have meant "tunneling", which can improve roaming. On a ZD1100, with a lot of clients you do need to keep an eye on resource (CPU/RAM) usage though.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 21:18:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/Meshing/m-p/22504#M4529</guid>
      <dc:creator>keith_redfield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-31T21:18:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Meshing</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/Meshing/m-p/22505#M4530</link>
      <description>Not to confuse, if your deployment is mix of 7341 and 7962 on same site. (I know you mentioned). Just a heads up, 7341 and 7962 will not MESH with each other as 7962 will mesh ONLY with same type AP like 7982, 7762, 7363 etc.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 16:55:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ZoneDirector/Meshing/m-p/22505#M4530</guid>
      <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-01T16:55:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

