<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Adaptive Band Balancing Appears Awesome in Unleashed</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/76762#M5821</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;There is your problem is that you’re using R510’s… for example ruckus h350 is significantly worst than the R750. To cover my entire house I would need two of the H3 50s. I only need one R750 and some extra signal on the edges. Just saying. You can’t complain about an access points performance if it’s hardware is limited&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anye02</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-10T11:30:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Adaptive Band Balancing Appears Awesome</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/15260#M1029</link>
      <description>&lt;P alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""&gt;&lt;/P&gt;Just wanted to chime in on a hidden feature that’s not even noted in the Unleashed documentation (you need to review the ZoneDirector documentation).&amp;nbsp; Ever since upgrading to 200.8, I noticed the Adaptive Band Balancing setting in Services/Radio Control.&amp;nbsp; I have enabled this feature and consistently notice more clients on the 5GHz band compared to previously using only the Percent of clients on 2.4GHz radio setting.&amp;nbsp; While I’ve yet to get a picture of this long term at this time, it appears to be working as promised and just wanted to make more people aware of it.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Cheers.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:07:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/15260#M1029</guid>
      <dc:creator>daniel_m</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-10T14:07:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adaptive Band Balancing Appears Awesome</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/15261#M1030</link>
      <description>I have this enabled and it pushes more devices to the 2.4ghz network.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:12:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/15261#M1030</guid>
      <dc:creator>ryanhayes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-10T14:12:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adaptive Band Balancing Appears Awesome</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/15262#M1031</link>
      <description>Do you tend to have reduced signal coverage, which, in this case, would mean 2.4GHz might be better for these devices?&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:19:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/15262#M1031</guid>
      <dc:creator>daniel_m</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-10T14:19:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adaptive Band Balancing Appears Awesome</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/15263#M1032</link>
      <description>Nope. I have a fairly small home running 2 R510's. I'm close to just disconnecting my AP's and going back to my ISP's router. Much better performance.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:39:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/15263#M1032</guid>
      <dc:creator>ryanhayes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-10T14:39:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adaptive Band Balancing Appears Awesome</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/76762#M5821</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is your problem is that you’re using R510’s… for example ruckus h350 is significantly worst than the R750. To cover my entire house I would need two of the H3 50s. I only need one R750 and some extra signal on the edges. Just saying. You can’t complain about an access points performance if it’s hardware is limited&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:30:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/76762#M5821</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anye02</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-10T11:30:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adaptive Band Balancing Appears Awesome</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/80345#M6117</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It’s not the product, it’s the users and your environment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 00:05:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Unleashed/Adaptive-Band-Balancing-Appears-Awesome/m-p/80345#M6117</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anye02</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-28T00:05:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

