<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: UPLINK termination to the stack members and roles in ICX Switches</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/UPLINK-termination-to-the-stack-members-and-roles/m-p/45518#M3308</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In my opinion, I don't think it will matter much. The active controller is really the brains of the stack regardless of how you spread out the clients/links. I see a lot of two port lags get split between active and standby, but it will work the same no matter how you do it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 16:40:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BenBeck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-08T16:40:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UPLINK termination to the stack members and roles</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/UPLINK-termination-to-the-stack-members-and-roles/m-p/45461#M3303</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are planning build a new ICX7450 stack with 4 members, and will have two 10G UPLINKs to our core network.&lt;BR /&gt;These 10G connection will be terminated to module 2 (eth1/2/x) in different unit for physical redundancy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question here is to which unit we should terminate these two UPLINKs on this stack with roles below.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;UNIT-1: Active controller&lt;BR /&gt;UNIT-2: Standby controller&lt;BR /&gt;UNIT-3: member&lt;BR /&gt;UNIT-4: member&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My thoughts is that UPLINK should be terminated into unit 3 and 4 because of possible lower CPU utils due to member unit. But other guy suggests UPLINK should be on Active and Standby units.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if any best practices or recommendation..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 04:07:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/UPLINK-termination-to-the-stack-members-and-roles/m-p/45461#M3303</guid>
      <dc:creator>ys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-05T04:07:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UPLINK termination to the stack members and roles</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/UPLINK-termination-to-the-stack-members-and-roles/m-p/45518#M3308</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In my opinion, I don't think it will matter much. The active controller is really the brains of the stack regardless of how you spread out the clients/links. I see a lot of two port lags get split between active and standby, but it will work the same no matter how you do it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 16:40:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/UPLINK-termination-to-the-stack-members-and-roles/m-p/45518#M3308</guid>
      <dc:creator>BenBeck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-08T16:40:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UPLINK termination to the stack members and roles</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/UPLINK-termination-to-the-stack-members-and-roles/m-p/45566#M3330</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Ben.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2022 04:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/UPLINK-termination-to-the-stack-members-and-roles/m-p/45566#M3330</guid>
      <dc:creator>ys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-12T04:28:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

