<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Stacking ICX-6450-48P and ICX-7450-48P. Any reason why this would not be 
possible? in ICX Switches</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Stacking-ICX-6450-48P-and-ICX-7450-48P-Any-reason-why-this-would/m-p/37454#M2579</link>
    <description>I would like to stack some 6450s in with some 7450 stacks. Is there any reason why this would not be possible?&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 17:03:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>robert_pelletie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-13T17:03:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stacking ICX-6450-48P and ICX-7450-48P. Any reason why this would not be 
possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Stacking-ICX-6450-48P-and-ICX-7450-48P-Any-reason-why-this-would/m-p/37454#M2579</link>
      <description>I would like to stack some 6450s in with some 7450 stacks. Is there any reason why this would not be possible?&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 17:03:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Stacking-ICX-6450-48P-and-ICX-7450-48P-Any-reason-why-this-would/m-p/37454#M2579</guid>
      <dc:creator>robert_pelletie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-13T17:03:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking ICX-6450-48P and ICX-7450-48P. Any reason why this would not be 
possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Stacking-ICX-6450-48P-and-ICX-7450-48P-Any-reason-why-this-would/m-p/37455#M2580</link>
      <description>... They are not compatible together in the same stack as far as I know.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;They also run a completely different firmware with the 6450 running a family of up to 08.0.30.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;The 7450 runs the latest code up to the 08.0.90 family.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 17:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Stacking-ICX-6450-48P-and-ICX-7450-48P-Any-reason-why-this-would/m-p/37455#M2580</guid>
      <dc:creator>netwizz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-13T17:09:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stacking ICX-6450-48P and ICX-7450-48P. Any reason why this would not be 
possible?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Stacking-ICX-6450-48P-and-ICX-7450-48P-Any-reason-why-this-would/m-p/37456#M2581</link>
      <description>&lt;P alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""&gt;Hello Robert. &lt;/P&gt;



&lt;P alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""&gt;As NETWizz mentioned, they are not compatible for stacking,
they are from different families.&lt;/P&gt;



&lt;P alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""&gt;We support a Mixed stacking, but that would be between ICX 6610 devices and ICX
6450 devices. &lt;/P&gt;



&lt;P alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""&gt;Please check the link below for further information:&lt;/P&gt;



&lt;P alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""&gt;&lt;A alt="" href="http://docs.ruckuswireless.com/fastiron/08.0.30/fastiron-08030b-switchstackingguide/GUID-89D1A468-14ED-4C9C-A065-1E579B488AEA.html" name="" rel="nofollow" target="" title="" type="" value=""&gt;http://docs.ruckuswireless.com/fastiron/08.0.30/fastiron-08030b-switchstackingguide/GUID-89D1A468-14ED-4C9C-A065-1E579B488AEA.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value=""&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 17:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Stacking-ICX-6450-48P-and-ICX-7450-48P-Any-reason-why-this-would/m-p/37456#M2581</guid>
      <dc:creator>oscar_badilla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-13T17:16:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

