<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Switches using Router code vs Switch code and decision making in ICX Switches</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30258#M1604</link>
    <description>Hi Dan&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;How is the 150Mbps circuit presented; via a 1G connection that is rate-limited to 150M? If so then the 7150-24 will cope with this easily. &lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;What other functionality do you need?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 16:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>simon_pollard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-04T16:23:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Switches using Router code vs Switch code and decision making</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30255#M1601</link>
      <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When an ICX switch is on router code, is every packet a forwarding decision even if the ICX device is on a switched circuit on layer 2? If the ICX switch is not performing the routing, are we bound to the switching capacity or the forwarding capacity?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:25:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30255#M1601</guid>
      <dc:creator>dan_hogan_4ddkn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-04T14:25:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Switches using Router code vs Switch code and decision making</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30256#M1602</link>
      <description>Hi Dan&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Switching capacity is the raw throughput of the switch expressed in Gbps. Forwarding capacity refers to the packet forwarding performance for 64 byte packets (64 bytes + 20 bytes inter-frame gap) expressed in pps. In a line-rate system the two values are equal, just expressed differently.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;All Ruckus switches forward at line-rate whether operating in L2 or L3 configuration, so there is no performance trade-off in choosing one over the other, it's just a question of your feature requirements.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 16:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30256#M1602</guid>
      <dc:creator>simon_pollard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-04T16:01:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Switches using Router code vs Switch code and decision making</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30257#M1603</link>
      <description>Hi Simon,&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Thanks for your reply. Ultimately, I have a 150 Mbps circuit that I'm looking to put on a ICX 7150-24. With the current datasheet, It would appear that the 100/1000 port would easily handle the uplink port, would you agree that the 7150-24 would be the correct hardware for the job?&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 16:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30257#M1603</guid>
      <dc:creator>dan_hogan_4ddkn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-04T16:13:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Switches using Router code vs Switch code and decision making</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30258#M1604</link>
      <description>Hi Dan&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;How is the 150Mbps circuit presented; via a 1G connection that is rate-limited to 150M? If so then the 7150-24 will cope with this easily. &lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;What other functionality do you need?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 16:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30258#M1604</guid>
      <dc:creator>simon_pollard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-04T16:23:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Switches using Router code vs Switch code and decision making</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30259#M1605</link>
      <description>Hi Simon,&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;I believe so. We will be utilizing a second circuit of 50 x 50 as well on another port to load balance between two ISP's, that is the only other functionality we are looking into&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 16:57:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/ICX-Switches/Switches-using-Router-code-vs-Switch-code-and-decision-making/m-p/30259#M1605</guid>
      <dc:creator>dan_hogan_4ddkn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-04T16:57:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

