<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Could SZ unlink-redundancy for redundancy backbone? in SmartZone and Virtual SmartZone</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/SmartZone-and-Virtual-SmartZone/Could-SZ-unlink-redundancy-for-redundancy-backbone/m-p/41843#M3635</link>
    <description>Hi.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could a SZ100 unlink-redundancy for redundancy backbone switches?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Our customer asked about it of us.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Customer has two backbones for redundancy.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They want to connect a SZ to two backbone using two cable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could it on SZ100?</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 02:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hyosang_choi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-07T02:39:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Could SZ unlink-redundancy for redundancy backbone?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/SmartZone-and-Virtual-SmartZone/Could-SZ-unlink-redundancy-for-redundancy-backbone/m-p/41843#M3635</link>
      <description>Hi.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could a SZ100 unlink-redundancy for redundancy backbone switches?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Our customer asked about it of us.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Customer has two backbones for redundancy.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They want to connect a SZ to two backbone using two cable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could it on SZ100?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2017 02:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/SmartZone-and-Virtual-SmartZone/Could-SZ-unlink-redundancy-for-redundancy-backbone/m-p/41843#M3635</guid>
      <dc:creator>hyosang_choi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-07T02:39:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

