<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DPSK via RADIUS in To Be Moved</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/DPSK-via-RADIUS/m-p/42025#M2278</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;I am currently working on a DPSK + external RADIUS implementation. If I understand this correctly, the RADIUS must already be familiar to the PSK's by client MAC and then report it back by Ruckus VSA? So it is not the task of the RADIUS to grant access by the PSK?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I compare this with the internal Ruckus DPSK variant, can I not say that the same result can be achieved?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:17:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>volker_von_hoes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-28T09:17:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DPSK via RADIUS</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/DPSK-via-RADIUS/m-p/42025#M2278</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;I am currently working on a DPSK + external RADIUS implementation. If I understand this correctly, the RADIUS must already be familiar to the PSK's by client MAC and then report it back by Ruckus VSA? So it is not the task of the RADIUS to grant access by the PSK?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If I compare this with the internal Ruckus DPSK variant, can I not say that the same result can be achieved?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 09:17:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/DPSK-via-RADIUS/m-p/42025#M2278</guid>
      <dc:creator>volker_von_hoes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-28T09:17:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

