<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 7731 NLOS perfonmance in To Be Moved</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29978#M1680</link>
    <description>Thanks for explaining what NLOS means. I wasn't quite sure what the "O" stud for there.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
But my question was what grade of NLOS are you talking about? 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Generally you should keep the first Fresnel zone clear as much as possible. The more you "shade" it the less performance you will have. I wouldn't be comfortable of designing a link with at least 80% of it clear.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 16:57:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-01T16:57:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>7731 NLOS perfonmance</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29975#M1677</link>
      <description>Is there any experienced user tell me about 7731's NLOS perfonmance ? Or need an advice about 1.5 km link between two building just for advice, I know conditions are variable and lots of probability can be happen but need experience view.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:52:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29975#M1677</guid>
      <dc:creator>ali_sureyya_uz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T10:52:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7731 NLOS perfonmance</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29976#M1678</link>
      <description>What do you mean by NLOS. How much stuff is in the way and what kind?
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
But anyway I don't think you want to be designing a NLOS link at all.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 14:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29976#M1678</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T14:50:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7731 NLOS perfonmance</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29977#M1679</link>
      <description>NLOS = Non-line-of-sight, the two building cannot see each other mean, its very common thing to understand.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 16:33:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29977#M1679</guid>
      <dc:creator>ali_sureyya_uz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T16:33:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7731 NLOS perfonmance</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29978#M1680</link>
      <description>Thanks for explaining what NLOS means. I wasn't quite sure what the "O" stud for there.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
But my question was what grade of NLOS are you talking about? 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Generally you should keep the first Fresnel zone clear as much as possible. The more you "shade" it the less performance you will have. I wouldn't be comfortable of designing a link with at least 80% of it clear.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 16:57:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29978#M1680</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T16:57:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7731 NLOS perfonmance</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29979#M1681</link>
      <description>Thank you.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 17:53:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29979#M1681</guid>
      <dc:creator>ali_sureyya_uz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T17:53:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7731 NLOS perfonmance</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29980#M1682</link>
      <description>You're welcome &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 18:39:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29980#M1682</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-01T18:39:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7731 NLOS perfonmance</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29981#M1683</link>
      <description>Agreed, 7782 APs may mesh without good LoS, but would not design a 7731 PtP link without LoS visibility at any distance.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 18:46:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/7731-NLOS-perfonmance/m-p/29981#M1683</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael_brado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-02T18:46:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

