<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Connecting T300 Root AP to P300 point-to-point backhaul in To Be Moved</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Connecting-T300-Root-AP-to-P300-point-to-point-backhaul/m-p/28928#M1646</link>
    <description>this is doable and should not be a problematic setup and has been done before.&lt;BR /&gt;May i know what is the concern you may have??&lt;BR /&gt;As long as all devices are in on L2 domain, T300 talking to master AP via this P2p link should not be a concern as i think worst could be that T300 may not bcom master AP in this topology</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:27:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-12T11:27:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Connecting T300 Root AP to P300 point-to-point backhaul</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Connecting-T300-Root-AP-to-P300-point-to-point-backhaul/m-p/28927#M1645</link>
      <description>Does the connection between a T300 root AP and a P300 point-to-point backhaul require the use of a switch in an unleashed network?  This seems to be the case from the specs I have seen on each unit.   The attached image is what I had in mind but I am not sure if I can make the link between X any Y in the diagram without a switch. I don't need to attach any other devices other than wirelessly.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="Image_ images_messages_5f91c3ee135b77e2478ed285_973f4d24fb2a7afc8e5502ed20ae9edf_RackMultipart20170412170141kqh-bf40aecd-43f1-42aa-83bb-b8d0363cddc9-655193077.JPG1491973556"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1202iA338F5D08C56569B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Image_ images_messages_5f91c3ee135b77e2478ed285_973f4d24fb2a7afc8e5502ed20ae9edf_RackMultipart20170412170141kqh-bf40aecd-43f1-42aa-83bb-b8d0363cddc9-655193077.JPG1491973556" alt="Image_ images_messages_5f91c3ee135b77e2478ed285_973f4d24fb2a7afc8e5502ed20ae9edf_RackMultipart20170412170141kqh-bf40aecd-43f1-42aa-83bb-b8d0363cddc9-655193077.JPG1491973556" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 05:06:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Connecting-T300-Root-AP-to-P300-point-to-point-backhaul/m-p/28927#M1645</guid>
      <dc:creator>russell_holland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T05:06:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Connecting T300 Root AP to P300 point-to-point backhaul</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Connecting-T300-Root-AP-to-P300-point-to-point-backhaul/m-p/28928#M1646</link>
      <description>this is doable and should not be a problematic setup and has been done before.&lt;BR /&gt;May i know what is the concern you may have??&lt;BR /&gt;As long as all devices are in on L2 domain, T300 talking to master AP via this P2p link should not be a concern as i think worst could be that T300 may not bcom master AP in this topology</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:27:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Connecting-T300-Root-AP-to-P300-point-to-point-backhaul/m-p/28928#M1646</guid>
      <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T11:27:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

