<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Indoor Access Point and Wireless Controller... in To Be Moved</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Indoor-Access-Point-and-Wireless-Controller/m-p/23679#M1407</link>
    <description>Looking at your requirements:
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Cisco Indoor AP 1602 : &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/aironet-1600-series/data_sheet_c78-715702.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Just doing a quick comparison on major features which matters alot on performance and NOT pricing
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Cisco Indoor 1602 is dualband 3*3:2 and Ruckus Does not have dualband 3*3:2 product as far as i know however they do have a product which is a step down(ZF7363) AND a product which is really GOOD on performance (ZF7982)
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZF7363 is a 802.11a/b/g/n AP with Radio chains 2*2:2. this is little less on performance when compared to Cisco Indoor 1602 however good on price.	
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/zoneflex-indoor/zoneflex-7363#specs" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ruckuswireless.com/product...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZF7982 is a (Again) 802.11a/b/g/n AP with Radio chains 3*3:3 which is far better than Cisco Indoor 1602. It has proven to be real workhorse in real challenging wifi environment. 
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/zoneflex-indoor/zoneflex-7982#specs" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ruckuswireless.com/product...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
My take: If you are constraint on pricing and for lighter usage environment then would suggest ZF7363 BUT if thinking ahead for 5-6 years and keeping in mind ever increasing bandwidth hungry app's on the prowl then better go for ZF7982.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Also please keep in mind, Keeping high performance AP does not guarantee BEST performance as Alot depends on client capabilities.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
See another forum post for more that - &lt;A href="https://forums.ruckuswireless.com/ruckuswireless/topics/new_aps_improvements_over_older_aps?utm_source=notification&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_campaign=reply_like&amp;amp;utm_content=topic_link" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://forums.ruckuswireless.com/ruc...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
As Far as controller is concerned, Ruckus wireless just got 3 models of controller:
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZD1100, ZD3000, ZD5000
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Major criteria is how many AP's will controller manage. 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Looking at Cisco 5508 Wireless Controller which can manage MAX 500 AP's so "Zd3000" will be a BEST fit.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Best of LUCK with your tender.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-04-02T09:37:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Indoor Access Point and Wireless Controller...</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Indoor-Access-Point-and-Wireless-Controller/m-p/23678#M1406</link>
      <description>Presently I am preparing tender documents for Indoor Wi-Fi which includes Indoor Access Point and Wireless Controller.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Can anybody suggest best Indoor access Point (Model Number) &amp;amp; Wireless Controller which is comparable to CISCO product 1602 and 5508.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks in Advance</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 07:30:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Indoor-Access-Point-and-Wireless-Controller/m-p/23678#M1406</guid>
      <dc:creator>rajendra_talele</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-02T07:30:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Indoor Access Point and Wireless Controller...</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Indoor-Access-Point-and-Wireless-Controller/m-p/23679#M1407</link>
      <description>Looking at your requirements:
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Cisco Indoor AP 1602 : &lt;A href="http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/aironet-1600-series/data_sheet_c78-715702.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Just doing a quick comparison on major features which matters alot on performance and NOT pricing
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Cisco Indoor 1602 is dualband 3*3:2 and Ruckus Does not have dualband 3*3:2 product as far as i know however they do have a product which is a step down(ZF7363) AND a product which is really GOOD on performance (ZF7982)
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZF7363 is a 802.11a/b/g/n AP with Radio chains 2*2:2. this is little less on performance when compared to Cisco Indoor 1602 however good on price.	
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/zoneflex-indoor/zoneflex-7363#specs" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ruckuswireless.com/product...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZF7982 is a (Again) 802.11a/b/g/n AP with Radio chains 3*3:3 which is far better than Cisco Indoor 1602. It has proven to be real workhorse in real challenging wifi environment. 
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.ruckuswireless.com/products/zoneflex-indoor/zoneflex-7982#specs" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ruckuswireless.com/product...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
My take: If you are constraint on pricing and for lighter usage environment then would suggest ZF7363 BUT if thinking ahead for 5-6 years and keeping in mind ever increasing bandwidth hungry app's on the prowl then better go for ZF7982.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Also please keep in mind, Keeping high performance AP does not guarantee BEST performance as Alot depends on client capabilities.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
See another forum post for more that - &lt;A href="https://forums.ruckuswireless.com/ruckuswireless/topics/new_aps_improvements_over_older_aps?utm_source=notification&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_campaign=reply_like&amp;amp;utm_content=topic_link" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://forums.ruckuswireless.com/ruc...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
As Far as controller is concerned, Ruckus wireless just got 3 models of controller:
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZD1100, ZD3000, ZD5000
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Major criteria is how many AP's will controller manage. 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Looking at Cisco 5508 Wireless Controller which can manage MAX 500 AP's so "Zd3000" will be a BEST fit.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Best of LUCK with your tender.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/To-Be-Moved/Indoor-Access-Point-and-Wireless-Controller/m-p/23679#M1407</guid>
      <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-02T09:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

