<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wireless Controller Recommendation in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35088#M9928</link>
    <description>The way that Ruckus are moving is towards the SZ platform, as they are slowly merging the ZD platform funtionality, but I cant see the ZD's being marked for EOL just yet as they still have a place in the market in my eyes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In regards to DPSK, it is a given that this will make its way to the SZ platform, but in terms of timeline I am unsure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The only real thing that sets the SZ100 apart from the ZD's are the interfaces, of which you get 2 models on the SZ100:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;1GE Model: 4 Gigabit Ethernet ports
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;10GE Model: 2 x 10Gigabit Ethernet ports and 4 Gigabit Ethernet Ports&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;If you are tunnelling your traffic back and your net capacity exceeds 1 Gigabit then you might need a SZ as all you get with the ZD's are 1 Gigabit.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 23:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>seanmuir</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-03T23:10:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wireless Controller Recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35085#M9925</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i have a wireless Project in a Hospital.&lt;BR /&gt;Customer needs Guest Access (with Guest Passes) and 802.1x Authentication.&lt;BR /&gt;DPSK and Zero-IT are also interessting Features for my customer.&lt;BR /&gt;Customer is running a VMware vSphere Cluster.&lt;BR /&gt;There are 75 - 90 APs planned (ZF R500).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What Controller is recommended?&lt;BR /&gt;ZD3000 or is there maybe a virtual Solution without any Hardware?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kind Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Marco</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 20:47:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35085#M9925</guid>
      <dc:creator>marco_eichstet1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-01T20:47:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Controller Recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35086#M9926</link>
      <description>Hi Marco,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I run the ICT infrastructure for an arts/conference venue which during corporate event our Wi-Fi gets pushed hard. We've got 30 APs, most R600 and currently use a 3000. Although within ZD1100 scope our clients were pushing the network too hard so we upgraded. You just need to review possible number of clients and also WLAN/AP groups across the hospital as APs have limitations. We use c. 8-10 WLANs at any one time all on their own subnet (/22 to /24) and all traffic routed via the ZD. For us with around 850 clients the system works perfectly and changes are easy to deploy. I don't think Ruckus have a hosted based controller. There are Wi-Fi platforms that do but I'm sure that Ruckus would be much more cost effective. Hope this helps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Chris</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 22:08:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35086#M9926</guid>
      <dc:creator>phillipsca</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-01T22:08:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Controller Recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35087#M9927</link>
      <description>Hello Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks for your reply.&lt;BR /&gt;I think a ZD3000 will be in fact a good choice for me, too.&lt;BR /&gt;ZD1200 whould be my prefered Controller if there whould be less APs because i am able to license my APs one by one and not in License Packages.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;@Ruckus&lt;BR /&gt;I am a little scared that ZD3000 will be discounted in a way like the ZD1100.&lt;BR /&gt;This was not really good thing for my customers and me.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I saw there is a SmartZone Product Line.&lt;BR /&gt;Is this also a possible Controller Solution (e. g. SmartZone 100)?&lt;BR /&gt;I read there is no DPSK available. What are the Plans from Ruckus Wireless? DPSK for SmartZone planned? Will be the SmartZone Product line the replacment for the ZoneDirector Product Line?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kind Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Marco</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:19:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35087#M9927</guid>
      <dc:creator>marco_eichstet1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-03T12:19:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Controller Recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35088#M9928</link>
      <description>The way that Ruckus are moving is towards the SZ platform, as they are slowly merging the ZD platform funtionality, but I cant see the ZD's being marked for EOL just yet as they still have a place in the market in my eyes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In regards to DPSK, it is a given that this will make its way to the SZ platform, but in terms of timeline I am unsure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The only real thing that sets the SZ100 apart from the ZD's are the interfaces, of which you get 2 models on the SZ100:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;1GE Model: 4 Gigabit Ethernet ports
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;10GE Model: 2 x 10Gigabit Ethernet ports and 4 Gigabit Ethernet Ports&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;If you are tunnelling your traffic back and your net capacity exceeds 1 Gigabit then you might need a SZ as all you get with the ZD's are 1 Gigabit.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 23:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35088#M9928</guid>
      <dc:creator>seanmuir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-03T23:10:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Controller Recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35089#M9929</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;Ok. I will go with ZD because DPSK is an issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;Kind Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Marco</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35089#M9929</guid>
      <dc:creator>marco_eichstet1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-05T12:00:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wireless Controller Recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35090#M9930</link>
      <description>wise move &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:21:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Wireless-Controller-Recommendation/m-p/35090#M9930</guid>
      <dc:creator>seanmuir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-08T12:21:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

