<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Aggressiveness of Protecting the Network in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Aggressiveness-of-Protecting-the-Network/m-p/34534#M9780</link>
    <description>I've searched and searched, but I cannot find a definitive explanation of the differences in "aggressive, auto, and conservative" network protection. Under the rogue classification policy, it allows you to chose the "aggressiveness of protecting your network" but I can't find out what auto vs conservative vs aggressive actually does. Is it different levels of jamming, alerting, what exactly will conservative network protection mean?&lt;BR /&gt;I sincerely appreciate any help.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 18:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>steve_cunningha</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-06T18:07:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Aggressiveness of Protecting the Network</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Aggressiveness-of-Protecting-the-Network/m-p/34534#M9780</link>
      <description>I've searched and searched, but I cannot find a definitive explanation of the differences in "aggressive, auto, and conservative" network protection. Under the rogue classification policy, it allows you to chose the "aggressiveness of protecting your network" but I can't find out what auto vs conservative vs aggressive actually does. Is it different levels of jamming, alerting, what exactly will conservative network protection mean?&lt;BR /&gt;I sincerely appreciate any help.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 18:07:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Aggressiveness-of-Protecting-the-Network/m-p/34534#M9780</guid>
      <dc:creator>steve_cunningha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-06T18:07:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggressiveness of Protecting the Network</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Aggressiveness-of-Protecting-the-Network/m-p/34535#M9781</link>
      <description>Hi Steve,&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Our legacy implementation is to send one de-auth packet per background cycle scan cycle (Conservative interval).&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;This has been enhanced from 5.1 where we have several options to configure:&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;- With the aggressive interval, AP will send the de-auth frame every 2 seconds.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;- With the auto interval, AP will dynamically send out de-auth frame based on the current wireless traffic load of a radio.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;- With conservative interval, a de-auth frame will be sent out per background scan cycle (this is the default behavior pre-5.1).&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;I hope this helps.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 03:05:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Aggressiveness-of-Protecting-the-Network/m-p/34535#M9781</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanjay_kumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-09T03:05:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggressiveness of Protecting the Network</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Aggressiveness-of-Protecting-the-Network/m-p/34536#M9782</link>
      <description>That is exactly the answer I was looking for. Thank you so much!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 12:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Aggressiveness-of-Protecting-the-Network/m-p/34536#M9782</guid>
      <dc:creator>steve_cunningha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-09T12:55:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggressiveness of Protecting the Network</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Aggressiveness-of-Protecting-the-Network/m-p/34537#M9783</link>
      <description>I'm glad that the information was helpful.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:10:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Aggressiveness-of-Protecting-the-Network/m-p/34537#M9783</guid>
      <dc:creator>sanjay_kumar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-11T03:10:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

