<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: channefly and 7731 in the works? in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32053#M9012</link>
    <description>Is there a replacement bridge in the works then?   Yes, we do run channel optimization and it works well to find a good channel, but in one particular install we're seeing that that the perfect channel one hour ends up with terrible interference occasionally and just kills the bridge performance.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Wireless bridging is kind of an all or none thing... either it works great 99.9% of the time or people don't want it, so if the unit can't dynamically deal with issues, customers end up very unhappy.   Any strategies for this?
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Jeff</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:11:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jeff_roback</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-10-14T15:11:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>channefly and 7731 in the works?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32051#M9010</link>
      <description>Are there any plans to add ChannelFly functionality to the 7731 bridges?     This really seems like it would be the perfect use of this technology.  Since both endpoints are known and controlled and we're more concerned than ever about real-world throughput available on each channel, having the bridge use ChannelFly to make decisions about channel usage would be a real standout feature for these bridges.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Jeff</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 18:35:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32051#M9010</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeff_roback</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-11T18:35:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: channefly and 7731 in the works?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32052#M9011</link>
      <description>7731 is code frozen.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
But you do have channel measurement. Run that.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 06:04:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32052#M9011</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-14T06:04:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: channefly and 7731 in the works?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32053#M9012</link>
      <description>Is there a replacement bridge in the works then?   Yes, we do run channel optimization and it works well to find a good channel, but in one particular install we're seeing that that the perfect channel one hour ends up with terrible interference occasionally and just kills the bridge performance.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Wireless bridging is kind of an all or none thing... either it works great 99.9% of the time or people don't want it, so if the unit can't dynamically deal with issues, customers end up very unhappy.   Any strategies for this?
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Jeff</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:11:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32053#M9012</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeff_roback</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-14T15:11:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: channefly and 7731 in the works?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32054#M9013</link>
      <description>Using the 24dBi or even higher gain antenna with small side lobes could probably  help. It will limit the interference if not directly in the main lobe. Have you tried it?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 18:24:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32054#M9013</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-14T18:24:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: channefly and 7731 in the works?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32055#M9014</link>
      <description>To the original question, after Channel Optimization gives the best bi-directional
&lt;BR /&gt;
throughput channel choice, the link channel remains static.  Changing a Root
&lt;BR /&gt;
Bridge channel, will cause drops/packet loss for traffic across the bridge links,
&lt;BR /&gt;
is why the 7731 does not change channels (with Channelfly or Background scan).
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
In extremely challenging environments, you may need to run Chano from time to
&lt;BR /&gt;
time if the throughput appears to be less than it was.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32055#M9014</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael_brado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-14T23:22:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: channefly and 7731 in the works?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32056#M9015</link>
      <description>Yes, but if I understand, Jeff said that all channels are affected by interference. If he runs the Chano, he will loose connectivity for 10 min each time. 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
A very directional antenna will limit the interference received (if it's not in the main lobe), so running Chano frequently, will not be necesary.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 07:13:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/channefly-and-7731-in-the-works/m-p/32056#M9015</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-15T07:13:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

