<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How effective is channelfly? in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25652#M6981</link>
    <description>It may also be worth knowing that Channel Fly version 2 is coming out, which will bring significant improvements to an already a great way of improving throughput.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>seanmuir</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-21T00:23:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How effective is channelfly?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25650#M6979</link>
      <description>I see channel-fly jumping to the overlapping channel a lot (2.4ghz) I am wondering how effective is this in an environment where 2.4ghz is noisy?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;should I go in CLI and Blacklist the overlapping channel?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 01:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25650#M6979</guid>
      <dc:creator>adam_tran_76457</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-16T01:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How effective is channelfly?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25651#M6980</link>
      <description>Channel fly is more effective than manual heuristics such as 1/6/11. That's because it dynamically scores each channel it chooses based off ACTUAL throughout rather than predicted throughout. 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
In particular, sometimes overlapping channels with side interference will still outperform a busy non-overlapping channel. Or, you might be next to a very non-busy AP and even though Channelfly picked the same channel for both AP's, it's fine. 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
The key with Channelfly is that it's able to dynamically adapt to changing channel capacity.  If you want to do a similar job, you basically need to run continuous surveys by hand!</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2016 02:42:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25651#M6980</guid>
      <dc:creator>john_d</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-16T02:42:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How effective is channelfly?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25652#M6981</link>
      <description>It may also be worth knowing that Channel Fly version 2 is coming out, which will bring significant improvements to an already a great way of improving throughput.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25652#M6981</guid>
      <dc:creator>seanmuir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-21T00:23:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How effective is channelfly?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25653#M6982</link>
      <description>Whoa! Tell us more &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25653#M6982</guid>
      <dc:creator>john_d</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-21T00:27:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How effective is channelfly?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25654#M6983</link>
      <description>&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="Image_ images_messages_5f91c46d135b77e247a7fa4e_790e1562d7bbe44bf407ce2a96e780ca_RackMultipart201601211727011w9-f4fd149d-0c4a-4bf9-ab42-01a6541a0f27-205352016.png1453336924"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/713i08D804C98907F39C/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Image_ images_messages_5f91c46d135b77e247a7fa4e_790e1562d7bbe44bf407ce2a96e780ca_RackMultipart201601211727011w9-f4fd149d-0c4a-4bf9-ab42-01a6541a0f27-205352016.png1453336924" alt="Image_ images_messages_5f91c46d135b77e247a7fa4e_790e1562d7bbe44bf407ce2a96e780ca_RackMultipart201601211727011w9-f4fd149d-0c4a-4bf9-ab42-01a6541a0f27-205352016.png1453336924" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25654#M6983</guid>
      <dc:creator>seanmuir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-21T00:42:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How effective is channelfly?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25655#M6984</link>
      <description>Well that sounds wonderful! I presume this is a ZoneFlex 10.0 thing?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25655#M6984</guid>
      <dc:creator>john_d</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-21T00:51:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How effective is channelfly?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25656#M6985</link>
      <description>I think so as it didn't hit the 9.12.2 release notes.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25656#M6985</guid>
      <dc:creator>seanmuir</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-21T01:15:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How effective is channelfly?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25657#M6986</link>
      <description>That last one about preserving over reboots might just be a reason for me to try it again on 5Ghz</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/How-effective-is-channelfly/m-p/25657#M6986</guid>
      <dc:creator>dave_watkins_74</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-24T19:34:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

