<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 7782 vs 7762 in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2790#M67</link>
    <description>Hello Lonnie,
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Keeping in mind your requirements then i would suggest go for Zf7762 and really interested in major difference then take a look at below PDF. it is self descriptive however steering MORE on the technical side.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://a030f85c1e25003d7609-b98377aee968aad08453374eb1df3398.r40.cf2.rackcdn.com/product-info/ruckus-product-guide.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://a030f85c1e25003d7609-b98377aee...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Let us know if you have follow up questions. Hope this helps.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-11T08:01:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>7782 vs 7762</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2789#M66</link>
      <description>I am looking at the 7762 and 7782 units for an outdoor deployment of a single unit at our farm market. I want the range and weather resistance and capacity to mesh on 5 GHz to a couple 7363's, but don't need the high-density client features of the 7782.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Are there any other major differences between these two units besides the high density client handling of the 7782?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 10:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2789#M66</guid>
      <dc:creator>lonnie_3404113</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-08T10:09:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7782 vs 7762</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2790#M67</link>
      <description>Hello Lonnie,
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Keeping in mind your requirements then i would suggest go for Zf7762 and really interested in major difference then take a look at below PDF. it is self descriptive however steering MORE on the technical side.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://a030f85c1e25003d7609-b98377aee968aad08453374eb1df3398.r40.cf2.rackcdn.com/product-info/ruckus-product-guide.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://a030f85c1e25003d7609-b98377aee...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Let us know if you have follow up questions. Hope this helps.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 08:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2790#M67</guid>
      <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T08:01:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7782 vs 7762</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2791#M68</link>
      <description>Thanks. It doesn't show the 7762, but I think the 7762 is EOL. The 7782 being described as "carrier class" tells me it's overkill for my project.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 11:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2791#M68</guid>
      <dc:creator>lonnie_3404113</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T11:39:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7782 vs 7762</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2792#M69</link>
      <description>Info on 7762 is there. First column on the left on page 2.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://docdroid.net/fya9" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://docdroid.net/fya9&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Yes, 7782 would be a overkill so 7762 is good to go since other outdoor AP is ZF2741 which is EOL too and a single band and mesh won't work so among the options 7762 fits the best or you can put a indoor dual band AP in a enclosure as another option</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2792#M69</guid>
      <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T12:28:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7782 vs 7762</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2793#M70</link>
      <description>The first doc you linked to does not list the 7762. The 2nd doc does, and confirms this thread so far.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 12:31:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2793#M70</guid>
      <dc:creator>lonnie_3404113</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T12:31:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7782 vs 7762</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2794#M71</link>
      <description>Only APs with like radios can mesh together.  
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Single-band (2.4G) only APs mesh on 2.4G, shared with clients.  Dual-band APs mesh on 5G, and accept 5G clients, leaving 2.4G all for clients.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
But... like radios also means b/g versus b/g/n.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Old 2925/2942/2741 are single-band 802.11b/g only, and can mesh together on 2.4G.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Newer 7942/7343 were single-band 802.11b/g/n, and can mesh together on 2.4G.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Dual-band APs with n on both bands, include 7962/7762/7363/7982/7782, and these APs can mesh together on 5G backhaul for both band clients.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
What makes 7782 greater than 7762 is radio antennas and streams.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZF7982 is 3x3:3, and ZF7962 is 3x3:2 spatial streams.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
--
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
You have 7363 model APs with 2x2:2 antennas and spatial streams.  
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZF7762 will be the correct choice as ZF7982 will offer no better performance.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:07:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2794#M71</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael_brado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T20:07:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7782 vs 7762</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2795#M72</link>
      <description>Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:15:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2795#M72</guid>
      <dc:creator>lonnie_3404113</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-11T20:15:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7782 vs 7762</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2796#M73</link>
      <description>Please check out the new Ruckus outdoor 802.11ac AP , the R300. It just might be what you are looking for.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 23:06:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2796#M73</guid>
      <dc:creator>mike_kuly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T23:06:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7782 vs 7762</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2797#M74</link>
      <description>The T300 outdoor 802.11ac model AP, will be supported by ZoneFlex 9.9 release firmware.  R300 (indoor 802.11n) model AP is supported from ZoneFlex 9.7, and
&lt;BR /&gt;
the R700 (indoor 802.11ac) model AP is supported in ZoneFlex 9.8 (current GA),
&lt;BR /&gt;
and later.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2014 20:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7782-vs-7762/m-p/2797#M74</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael_brado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-15T20:36:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

