<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Ruckus t710 as t310 replacement -would it be benefit? in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-t710-as-t310-replacement-would-it-be-benefit/m-p/15921#M4142</link>
    <description>I have ruckus unleashed deployment in country house. i have fiber internet and cable to my garage.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;on street wall there is Ruckus T310d.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;and in main house (15 meters) + 1meter brick wall - 2 ruckus r710 for clients.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Internet channel currently 100mbit, but i'd like to increase to 300.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Currently averange number of devices for unleashed -20. including smartphones, tablets, notebooks, tv, fire tv 4k etc....&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;10 people in self-isolation.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;My question is -&amp;nbsp; if i replace T310d to R710 will my connection speed on wireless mesh bridge increase?&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;currently i have ~130-150mbit between devices and radio quality 21.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;if i replace T310d with R710 would it benefit connection speed? or anyway mesh utilize only 1 channel?&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Coverage on street is fine with t310d.. i need speed.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>anton_kuzmin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-06-12T17:21:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ruckus t710 as t310 replacement -would it be benefit?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-t710-as-t310-replacement-would-it-be-benefit/m-p/15921#M4142</link>
      <description>I have ruckus unleashed deployment in country house. i have fiber internet and cable to my garage.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;on street wall there is Ruckus T310d.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;and in main house (15 meters) + 1meter brick wall - 2 ruckus r710 for clients.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Internet channel currently 100mbit, but i'd like to increase to 300.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Currently averange number of devices for unleashed -20. including smartphones, tablets, notebooks, tv, fire tv 4k etc....&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;10 people in self-isolation.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;My question is -&amp;nbsp; if i replace T310d to R710 will my connection speed on wireless mesh bridge increase?&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;currently i have ~130-150mbit between devices and radio quality 21.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;if i replace T310d with R710 would it benefit connection speed? or anyway mesh utilize only 1 channel?&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Coverage on street is fine with t310d.. i need speed.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-t710-as-t310-replacement-would-it-be-benefit/m-p/15921#M4142</guid>
      <dc:creator>anton_kuzmin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-12T17:21:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruckus t710 as t310 replacement -would it be benefit?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-t710-as-t310-replacement-would-it-be-benefit/m-p/15922#M4143</link>
      <description>Hi Anton,&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;R710 is a 4X4:4 AP and T310d is 2x2:2, means R720 has 4 TX, 4 RX chains and can support upto 4 spatial streams, means higher data rates (assuming R710 will mesh with R710).&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;But please note that R710 is a indoor AP and R310d is outdoor, so make sure an indoor AP do not expose to outdoor environment else it may cause issues with hardware (rain, high/low temperature, etc.).&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Syamantak Omer&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:49:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-t710-as-t310-replacement-would-it-be-benefit/m-p/15922#M4143</guid>
      <dc:creator>syamantakomer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-12T17:49:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruckus t710 as t310 replacement -would it be benefit?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-t710-as-t310-replacement-would-it-be-benefit/m-p/15923#M4144</link>
      <description>thank you for a reply!&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;or couse, i will use outdoor T710 version.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;My question is - will my backdoor mesh network utilize 1 stream, and 3 streams for clients, or, for example it can utilize 2 or 3 stream and 2 or 1 for client?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-t710-as-t310-replacement-would-it-be-benefit/m-p/15923#M4144</guid>
      <dc:creator>anton_kuzmin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-12T18:08:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruckus t710 as t310 replacement -would it be benefit?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-t710-as-t310-replacement-would-it-be-benefit/m-p/15924#M4145</link>
      <description>Hi Anton,&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;My response was based on the details given by you and you have mentioned "R710".&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Yes, if T710 is meshing with R710 or a 4x4:4 AP (both should be getting full power to enable all 4 chains and high throughput) then mesh link will get higher throughput and client behind it will also get high throughput.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Use of RX/TX chains depends upon multiple factors like client supportability, compatibility, multipath, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Syamantak Omer</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-t710-as-t310-replacement-would-it-be-benefit/m-p/15924#M4145</guid>
      <dc:creator>syamantakomer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-12T20:19:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

