<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R500 Large Ping &amp; unstable path to client in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13178#M3162</link>
    <description>how can i get this information, &lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;because i'm also seeing this following stupidity as well, something i documented previously, but it was never this bad...&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;A totally STATIC computer in an EMPTY office, with no partitioning or staff or anything moving about after hours.....&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Not even any security staff......&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="Image_ images_messages_5f91c450135b77e247a1c653_0e64f22e3de64ff0208ce9cc8f5986e0_RackMultipart202009088718062q3-09e8ee0c-81a0-4a33-9581-b2711054bdd0-645575371.jpg1599527181"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1976iC09D9B43DDB3D762/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Image_ images_messages_5f91c450135b77e247a1c653_0e64f22e3de64ff0208ce9cc8f5986e0_RackMultipart202009088718062q3-09e8ee0c-81a0-4a33-9581-b2711054bdd0-645575371.jpg1599527181" alt="Image_ images_messages_5f91c450135b77e247a1c653_0e64f22e3de64ff0208ce9cc8f5986e0_RackMultipart202009088718062q3-09e8ee0c-81a0-4a33-9581-b2711054bdd0-645575371.jpg1599527181" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;s&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 01:08:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>itdept_head_me</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-08T01:08:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R500 Large Ping &amp; unstable path to client</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13176#M3160</link>
      <description>Am seeing massive "ping delays &amp;amp; drops to&amp;nbsp; clients&amp;nbsp; under R500 AP.. .sometimes.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Basically the APs' operate in a very polluted hostile environment.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Client is windows ,traffic is next to nothing.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;172.20.1.121&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;802.11b/g/n&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;-66 dBm&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;46 dB&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Excellent&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;ping to the AP&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;ping 172.20.0.6&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;PING 172.20.0.6 (172.20.0.6): 56 data bytes&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.0.6: icmp_seq=0 ttl=63 time=6.982 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.0.6: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=6.812 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.0.6: icmp_seq=2 ttl=63 time=6.685 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.0.6: icmp_seq=3 ttl=63 time=6.707 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;ping to the client&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=967 ttl=63 time=108.552 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Request timeout for icmp_seq 968&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Request timeout for icmp_seq 969&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Request timeout for icmp_seq 970&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=969 ttl=63 time=2324.465 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=970 ttl=63 time=1399.448 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=971 ttl=63 time=395.006 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=972 ttl=63 time=528.905 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=973 ttl=63 time=212.009 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=974 ttl=63 time=757.311 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=975 ttl=63 time=276.469 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=976 ttl=63 time=1269.509 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=977 ttl=63 time=267.469 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=978 ttl=63 time=1972.205 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=979 ttl=63 time=970.159 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=980 ttl=63 time=55.247 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=981 ttl=63 time=394.299 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=982 ttl=63 time=617.992 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=983 ttl=63 time=536.143 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=984 ttl=63 time=48.595 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;64 bytes from 172.20.1.63: icmp_seq=985 ttl=63 time=1613.516 ms&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;My main issue is why it is classed as "excellent"?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is there any way to get counters on resends/drops, that sort of thing?&lt;BR /&gt;packet loss?&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 04:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13176#M3160</guid>
      <dc:creator>itdept_head_me</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-07T04:21:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R500 Large Ping &amp; unstable path to client</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13177#M3161</link>
      <description>Hi Caveman,&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;It is classified as per the signal strength of the connected client, but not the send/receive/drops frames.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Syamantak Omer</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 17:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13177#M3161</guid>
      <dc:creator>syamantakomer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-07T17:57:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R500 Large Ping &amp; unstable path to client</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13178#M3162</link>
      <description>how can i get this information, &lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;because i'm also seeing this following stupidity as well, something i documented previously, but it was never this bad...&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;A totally STATIC computer in an EMPTY office, with no partitioning or staff or anything moving about after hours.....&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Not even any security staff......&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="Image_ images_messages_5f91c450135b77e247a1c653_0e64f22e3de64ff0208ce9cc8f5986e0_RackMultipart202009088718062q3-09e8ee0c-81a0-4a33-9581-b2711054bdd0-645575371.jpg1599527181"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1976iC09D9B43DDB3D762/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Image_ images_messages_5f91c450135b77e247a1c653_0e64f22e3de64ff0208ce9cc8f5986e0_RackMultipart202009088718062q3-09e8ee0c-81a0-4a33-9581-b2711054bdd0-645575371.jpg1599527181" alt="Image_ images_messages_5f91c450135b77e247a1c653_0e64f22e3de64ff0208ce9cc8f5986e0_RackMultipart202009088718062q3-09e8ee0c-81a0-4a33-9581-b2711054bdd0-645575371.jpg1599527181" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;s&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 01:08:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13178#M3162</guid>
      <dc:creator>itdept_head_me</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-08T01:08:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R500 Large Ping &amp; unstable path to client</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13179#M3163</link>
      <description>If overlapping between the APs is very high, sometimes client may get confused and unable to decide which AP is best, thus frequently roams between nearest APs.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;Please note that roaming is totally a client UE decision and its driver configuration.&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;You can remediate this by changing BSS minrate to 12Mbps in WLAN setting and see if it fixes the issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also it is worth checking if this system has a USB 3.0 device connected to it, because client is connected on 2.4 G radio and USB 3.0 devices cause interference on 2.4 G radio.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Syamantak Omer</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:43:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13179#M3163</guid>
      <dc:creator>syamantakomer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-08T12:43:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R500 Large Ping &amp; unstable path to client</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13180#M3164</link>
      <description>I would say not, it is the AP to decide IF it accepts a client on a new AP, that is hopefully WHY you have a controller.....&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;It should still up to the AP to tell the client to get lost , if it considers there is no gain in changing AP&amp;nbsp; ESP.... as the AP can be set for a client limit....&lt;BR alt="" name="" rel="" target="" title="" type="" value="" /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 00:59:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-Large-Ping-unstable-path-to-client/m-p/13180#M3164</guid>
      <dc:creator>itdept_head_me</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-09T00:59:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

