<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R500 performance vs 7962 in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-performance-vs-7962/m-p/10066#M2296</link>
    <description>The upgrade to AC is actually huge compared to any N devices. Even comparing a behemoth-class N AP like the outdoor 7782 versus a Ruckus R500 sitting in a utility closet separated by a wall, the R500 is able to consistently deliver higher speeds to AC-capable clients.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ruckus's BeamFlex technology does a great job of delivering a stronger signal to a bigger radius such that 802.11ac is no longer just a line-of-sight parlor trick, but rather clients at even substantial distances can take advantage of 802.11ac rates.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A lot of the advantage of 802.11ac actually comes from 80MHz channels, which only are practical to use in a low or medium density installation. In a super high density environment, there is likely too much co-channel interference to use 80MHz effectively.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:42:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>john_d</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-11-30T06:42:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R500 performance vs 7962</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-performance-vs-7962/m-p/10065#M2295</link>
      <description>Just wondering actual performance differences you may have seen.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:03:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-performance-vs-7962/m-p/10065#M2295</guid>
      <dc:creator>dale_234724</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-30T06:03:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R500 performance vs 7962</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-performance-vs-7962/m-p/10066#M2296</link>
      <description>The upgrade to AC is actually huge compared to any N devices. Even comparing a behemoth-class N AP like the outdoor 7782 versus a Ruckus R500 sitting in a utility closet separated by a wall, the R500 is able to consistently deliver higher speeds to AC-capable clients.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ruckus's BeamFlex technology does a great job of delivering a stronger signal to a bigger radius such that 802.11ac is no longer just a line-of-sight parlor trick, but rather clients at even substantial distances can take advantage of 802.11ac rates.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A lot of the advantage of 802.11ac actually comes from 80MHz channels, which only are practical to use in a low or medium density installation. In a super high density environment, there is likely too much co-channel interference to use 80MHz effectively.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:42:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/R500-performance-vs-7962/m-p/10066#M2296</guid>
      <dc:creator>john_d</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-30T06:42:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

