<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: T300 RSSI is better than T610 in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/T300-RSSI-is-better-than-T610/m-p/10011#M2291</link>
    <description>Very appreciate, thanks for help.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 09:55:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wesley_wang_770</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-04T09:55:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>T300 RSSI is better than T610</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/T300-RSSI-is-better-than-T610/m-p/10009#M2289</link>
      <description>As the customer's request, we did a test for T300 and T610 recently to make sure T610 coverage and performance are greater than T300. The test items and results as below :&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) RSSI signal test with Fluke AirCheck tester, T300 RSSI is better than T610. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) SpeedFlex test with&amp;nbsp;IPhone 6, T610 speed test is better than T300.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My question &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) T610 TX power is bigger than T300, I don't know why T300 is better than T610?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) Speedtest result T610 is better than T300, is this due to T610 RX sensitivity is better than T300?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please resolve my doubt, many thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 03:20:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/T300-RSSI-is-better-than-T610/m-p/10009#M2289</guid>
      <dc:creator>wesley_wang_770</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-21T03:20:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T300 RSSI is better than T610</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/T300-RSSI-is-better-than-T610/m-p/10010#M2290</link>
      <description>Please contact your local VAR or Ruckus SE to help evaluate your testing procedures, regarding channels with least interference, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;No inference can be deducted from your reported findings, I'm sorry.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:54:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/T300-RSSI-is-better-than-T610/m-p/10010#M2290</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael_brado</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-27T16:54:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: T300 RSSI is better than T610</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/T300-RSSI-is-better-than-T610/m-p/10011#M2291</link>
      <description>Very appreciate, thanks for help.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 09:55:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/T300-RSSI-is-better-than-T610/m-p/10011#M2291</guid>
      <dc:creator>wesley_wang_770</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-04T09:55:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

