<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ruckus Zone Director 1100 with 3 AP zf7341 working on MESH - Performance issues 
observed in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-Zone-Director-1100-with-3-AP-zf7341-working-on-MESH/m-p/8938#M1992</link>
    <description>The rule is very simple.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
MESH is LAST RESORT, not primary topology in WLAN networks.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:09:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-12T14:09:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ruckus Zone Director 1100 with 3 AP zf7341 working on MESH - Performance issues 
observed</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-Zone-Director-1100-with-3-AP-zf7341-working-on-MESH/m-p/8935#M1989</link>
      <description>We have setup Ruckus Zone Director 1100  with One AP zf7341 as root AP and other two AP zf7341 on MESH.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
RuckusAP-Main- zf7341-Connected (Root AP)                     
&lt;BR /&gt;
RuckusAP-01 - zf7341 - Connected (eMesh AP, 2 hops) 
&lt;BR /&gt;
RuckusAP-02 - zf7341 - Connected (Mesh AP, 1 hop) 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Observation : Quality of connectivity is very good near Root AP ( @ Ground Floor)
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
The other two AP's are bit far from Root AP (@ First Floor and @ basement), clients near AP1 and AP2 get very low signal strength from Root AP and there is performance degradation in observed. 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
There is no provision to get the AP1 and AP2 getting connect through wired connectivity.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Question : Are there any product from RUCKUS to enhance the signal quality (repeater)or the only way to improve the signal strength is by connecting the AP1 and AP2 through wired connectivity.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Vendor Recommendation :
&lt;BR /&gt;
Add new  outdoor ZF 2741 to make it as root AP and move the existing  zf7341-(Root AP) near AP1 and AP2.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 09:54:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-Zone-Director-1100-with-3-AP-zf7341-working-on-MESH/m-p/8935#M1989</guid>
      <dc:creator>sumanth_k_j</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-12T09:54:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruckus Zone Director 1100 with 3 AP zf7341 working on MESH - Performance issues 
observed</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-Zone-Director-1100-with-3-AP-zf7341-working-on-MESH/m-p/8936#M1990</link>
      <description>You've got 3 problems. 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
One is that APs are quite far form root the other is that bandwidth is shared among the 3 and the clients they are connected to it and you have spread the collision domain very far so you are getting hidden nodes probably.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
So the main suggestion is that you run cable. The other option is to get 2 7731 bridges and make a link, however that one is a bit McGyver style. 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Vendor recommendation is wrong!!! 2741 will NOT mesh with 7341. I doubt someone at RW gave you that idea.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:17:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-Zone-Director-1100-with-3-AP-zf7341-working-on-MESH/m-p/8936#M1990</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-12T10:17:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruckus Zone Director 1100 with 3 AP zf7341 working on MESH - Performance issues 
observed</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-Zone-Director-1100-with-3-AP-zf7341-working-on-MESH/m-p/8937#M1991</link>
      <description>Good point, Thank you for suggesting the optimal best solution with the present devices in place.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
We checked on ZoneFlex 7731 specs and did not find it much relevant to our requirement.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Question : I the case of running the cable to the two access points
&lt;BR /&gt;
RuckusAP-01 - zf7341 and RuckusAP-02 - zf7341 will the Ruckus Zone Director 1100 treat the 2 APs as Root APs or can there be two more Root APs in the network.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Spoke to vendor he also agreed the option to add in 7341 on mesh is wrong.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Will update after cabling and performance details</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:12:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-Zone-Director-1100-with-3-AP-zf7341-working-on-MESH/m-p/8937#M1991</guid>
      <dc:creator>sumanth_k_j</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-12T13:12:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruckus Zone Director 1100 with 3 AP zf7341 working on MESH - Performance issues 
observed</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-Zone-Director-1100-with-3-AP-zf7341-working-on-MESH/m-p/8938#M1992</link>
      <description>The rule is very simple.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
MESH is LAST RESORT, not primary topology in WLAN networks.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:09:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-Zone-Director-1100-with-3-AP-zf7341-working-on-MESH/m-p/8938#M1992</guid>
      <dc:creator>primoz_marinsek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-12T14:09:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

