<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Load Balancing APs and ZoneDirector in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Load-Balancing-APs-and-ZoneDirector/m-p/43440#M12381</link>
    <description>For ZD, this thread:
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://forums.ruckuswireless.com/ruckuswireless/topics/2nd_ethernet_port" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://forums.ruckuswireless.com/ruc...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
would suggest to me that there's one NIC controller not two so aggregating/combining the two ports would not give you any benefit.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Also since the ZD is only for config/info/control data you'd have too have huge numbers of APs to stress it's ethernet port.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
As for APs well depends on the model...the more expensive ones might have seperate controllers.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
As always...I could be worng (or even wrong)!</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>max_o_driscoll</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-06-13T08:16:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load Balancing APs and ZoneDirector</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Load-Balancing-APs-and-ZoneDirector/m-p/43439#M12380</link>
      <description>We are moving to 10Gbps Backbone and we are seeing a larger amount on devices connecting. We'd love to increase throughput to the APS and the Zone Director with Load Balancing. 
&lt;BR /&gt;
I know they can give HR but Load balancing gives both Redundancy and increased throuput. 
&lt;BR /&gt;
Please consider?  If this could be done also at the AP with both POE and non POE ports (er somehow) that would be pretty cool!!!!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 01:32:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Load-Balancing-APs-and-ZoneDirector/m-p/43439#M12380</guid>
      <dc:creator>neal_mcarthur</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-13T01:32:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load Balancing APs and ZoneDirector</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Load-Balancing-APs-and-ZoneDirector/m-p/43440#M12381</link>
      <description>For ZD, this thread:
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="https://forums.ruckuswireless.com/ruckuswireless/topics/2nd_ethernet_port" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://forums.ruckuswireless.com/ruc...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
would suggest to me that there's one NIC controller not two so aggregating/combining the two ports would not give you any benefit.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Also since the ZD is only for config/info/control data you'd have too have huge numbers of APs to stress it's ethernet port.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
As for APs well depends on the model...the more expensive ones might have seperate controllers.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
As always...I could be worng (or even wrong)!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 08:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Load-Balancing-APs-and-ZoneDirector/m-p/43440#M12381</guid>
      <dc:creator>max_o_driscoll</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-13T08:16:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

