<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 7363 vs R700 radio quality? in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7363-vs-R700-radio-quality/m-p/43076#M12306</link>
    <description>I am considering taking advantage of the upgrade options (and pricing) available right now for the R700 and replacing some of my 7363. I am curious if there is a difference between the two? I know one is ac and other isn't and I am getting ac devices now that is why I am considering. Thanks for any feedback.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 22:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brian_hoyt_6612</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-06-06T22:07:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>7363 vs R700 radio quality?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7363-vs-R700-radio-quality/m-p/43076#M12306</link>
      <description>I am considering taking advantage of the upgrade options (and pricing) available right now for the R700 and replacing some of my 7363. I am curious if there is a difference between the two? I know one is ac and other isn't and I am getting ac devices now that is why I am considering. Thanks for any feedback.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 22:07:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7363-vs-R700-radio-quality/m-p/43076#M12306</guid>
      <dc:creator>brian_hoyt_6612</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-06T22:07:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 7363 vs R700 radio quality?</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7363-vs-R700-radio-quality/m-p/43077#M12307</link>
      <description>Hello Brian,
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZF7363 is no match for R700. R700 is NEXT generation AP, with more horse power and 128 MB RAM hence capable of handling more clients than ZF7363. ZF7363 got 64 MB RAM.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ZF7363 got 3 Eth ports whereas R700 got two.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Beamflex gains too better on R700.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
R700 got 3000+ whereas Zf7363 got with over 300 unique patterns.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
On R700 - Radio chains:streams is 3*3:3 where on ZF7363 it is 2*2:2
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
You can read more here on both: 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://a030f85c1e25003d7609-b98377aee968aad08453374eb1df3398.r40.cf2.rackcdn.com/datasheets/ds-zoneflex-7300-series.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://a030f85c1e25003d7609-b98377aee...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://a030f85c1e25003d7609-b98377aee968aad08453374eb1df3398.r40.cf2.rackcdn.com/product-info/ruckus-product-guide.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://a030f85c1e25003d7609-b98377aee...&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
i hope this helps.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 07:59:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/7363-vs-R700-radio-quality/m-p/43077#M12307</guid>
      <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-07T07:59:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

