<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ping time degrades for zf7731 in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/ping-time-degrades-for-zf7731/m-p/40928#M11586</link>
    <description>Hello Camara,
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
With Limited info, Link performance degradation over a period of time if there is no visible source of interference near the Zf7731 devices then it is possible case of Fresnel zone encroachment. In my experience - these are NOT seen immediate and takes time to rear its ugly head.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Take a look at Point-Point Bridge Best Practices doc just in case you missed out during planning stage.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://alturl.com/pud8p" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://alturl.com/pud8p&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Best of luck.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 11:52:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-05-27T11:52:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ping time degrades for zf7731</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/ping-time-degrades-for-zf7731/m-p/40927#M11585</link>
      <description>when the Ruckus wireless bridge is restarted, everything works perfectly: the response time of the remote terminal are 1ms and remote applications work perfectly 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
In time (of the order of the week, see ten days) ping time degrades (up from packet loss) and the application becomes non-functional (frames IP is not received). 
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
ping school to Parking
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 293 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 911 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1190 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 511 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 453 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 309 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 448 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 607 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1449 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 662 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 815 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 258 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 792 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 351 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1911 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 24 DC TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1393 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 393 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 511 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 472 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 273 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 271 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 990 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 669 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 269 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 548 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 993 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1192 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 833 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 954 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1219 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1457 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1761 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 754 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 774 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 233 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 674 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1308 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 864 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 742 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 450 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 548 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
Timeout of the request.
&lt;BR /&gt;
Reply from 192.168.121.242: bytes = 32 time = 1329 ms TTL = 63
&lt;BR /&gt;
The request timeout</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 11:01:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/ping-time-degrades-for-zf7731/m-p/40927#M11585</guid>
      <dc:creator>camara_harouna</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-27T11:01:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ping time degrades for zf7731</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/ping-time-degrades-for-zf7731/m-p/40928#M11586</link>
      <description>Hello Camara,
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
With Limited info, Link performance degradation over a period of time if there is no visible source of interference near the Zf7731 devices then it is possible case of Fresnel zone encroachment. In my experience - these are NOT seen immediate and takes time to rear its ugly head.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Take a look at Point-Point Bridge Best Practices doc just in case you missed out during planning stage.
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://alturl.com/pud8p" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://alturl.com/pud8p&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
Best of luck.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 11:52:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/ping-time-degrades-for-zf7731/m-p/40928#M11586</guid>
      <dc:creator>monnat_systems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-27T11:52:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

