<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Ruckus T310 Omni to 100m diameter coverage in Access Points - Indoor and Outdoor</title>
    <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-T310-Omni-to-100m-diameter-coverage/m-p/36970#M10409</link>
    <description>&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;Can T310C handle this aplication with good user experience u think? Or t610 at least is recommend?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2021 23:34:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rodrigo_jaques</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-14T23:34:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Ruckus T310 Omni to 100m diameter coverage</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-T310-Omni-to-100m-diameter-coverage/m-p/36968#M10407</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;Is T310c right AP for middle to high density placed on a kiosk beach to serves internet traffic for mobile and tablets?&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is a R510 indoor AP located and protected right below kiosk ceiling flap able to handle more connections and more robust solution?&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;thank&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;Im new with Ruckus APs.&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;Jaques.&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2021 06:36:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-T310-Omni-to-100m-diameter-coverage/m-p/36968#M10407</guid>
      <dc:creator>rodrigo_jaques</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-10T06:36:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruckus T310 Omni to 100m diameter coverage</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-T310-Omni-to-100m-diameter-coverage/m-p/36969#M10408</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;Even so they look very different, from RF point of view T310c is&amp;nbsp; actually more-less identical to R510 AP, it is just rugged to be used outdoors.&amp;nbsp; So if located in same way, results will be exactly the same. For 50 m it must be definitely OK. Normally, you want AP a few meters high -- 5m pole would be ideal. And you install AP with antenna facing down.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2021 12:23:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-T310-Omni-to-100m-diameter-coverage/m-p/36969#M10408</guid>
      <dc:creator>eizens_putnins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-12T12:23:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Ruckus T310 Omni to 100m diameter coverage</title>
      <link>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-T310-Omni-to-100m-diameter-coverage/m-p/36970#M10409</link>
      <description>&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;Can T310C handle this aplication with good user experience u think? Or t610 at least is recommend?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt; 
&lt;P style="margin: 0;"&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2021 23:34:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ruckuswireless.com/t5/Access-Points-Indoor-and-Outdoor/Ruckus-T310-Omni-to-100m-diameter-coverage/m-p/36970#M10409</guid>
      <dc:creator>rodrigo_jaques</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-14T23:34:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

